Oct 24 2011 05:44 PM ET

Is this the end for U2? And if it is, what would their legacy be?

bono

Image Credit: Kevin Mazur/WireImage.com

Though they have been working on a new album of songs they supposedly love, recently came off the most successful rock tour in history, and are celebrating the twentieth anniversary of one of their boldest accomplishments, 1991′s Achtung Baby, U2 could be packing it in.

In an interview with Rolling Stone, Bono spoke frankly about the band’s relevance and whether or not this seems like the end. “The band are like, ‘Will you shut up about being irrelevant?’” Bono told the magazine. “We’d be very pleased to end on No Line on the Horizon. We have so many [new] songs, some of our best. But I’m putting some time aside to just go and get lost in the music. I want to take my young boys and my wife and just disappear with my iPod Nano and some books and an acoustic guitar.”

Of course, Bono hedges a bit, adding “I doubt that” when asked about how realistic an instantaneous retirement would be. The Edge puts the odds at about 50/50 (“It’s quite likely you might hear from us next year, but it’s equally possible that you won’t,” he said), though as anybody who watched Davis Guggenheim’s documentary From the Sky Down knows, if U2 can survive the upheaval the led to Achtung Baby, then they probably have enough gas in the tank for another new album.

But for the sake of a reasonable argument on the Internet, let’s assume Bono wakes up tomorrow and decides to disappear to Thailand or something, taking the master tapes of whatever the band was working on and leaving no trace of music behind. All we’re left with is U2′s back catalog, ending with 2009′s No Line on the Horizon. How would U2 be remembered, based solely on their recorded output and assuming they’d never record again?

It’s actually a more loaded question than it seems. After all, we’re talking about a band who has at least three absolute stone-cold classics under its belt in 1987′s The Joshua Tree, 1991′s Achtung Baby, and 2000′s All That You Can’t Leave Behind.

Behind those, you have a pair of sub-classics (1983′s War and 1984′s The Unforgettable Fire), a handful of bold-if-failed experiments (1988′s Rattle and Hum, 1993′s Zooropa, and 1997′s Pop), and four albums that belong in the “totally fine” pile, with two competent formative efforts (1980′s Boy and 1981′s October), and a pair of late-career we’re-still-here albums (2004′s How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb and 2009′s No Line on the Horizon).

So on balance, does the greatness of those first three outweigh the stumbles on the lesser areas of the albums? If the three best albums cancel out the three worst, we’re still left with a relatively strong middle of the pack, even if only for The Unforgettable Fire.

Still, wouldn’t it leave something of a bad taste in everybody’s mouth if No Line on the Horizon was the last we heard of U2? Everybody put on a brave face when R.E.M. called it quits earlier this year, but even though this year’s Collapse Into Now was better than some of their other post-Bill Berry work, it still didn’t hold a candle to even the weakest collection during the Berry years (that would be New Adventures in Hi-Fi). If this is truly the end for Sonic Youth, 2009′s The Eternal is a reasonable but unremarkable epitaph.

Of course, it makes perfect sense that if there’s turmoil in the band that is great enough to break it apart, then the work will probably be sub-par. All sorts of seminal bands have walked out on middling releases, with a handful of them (including the Pixies and the Replacements) ending their band lives with their worst record. And did you realize that Black Sabbath’s final release was 1995′s atrocious Forbidden?

U2′s saving grace is that they have had a number of outstanding singles throughout their long career, so even the worst albums still have some killer songs, like Rattle and Hum‘s “Desire,” Pop‘s “Staring at the Sun,” October‘s “Fire,” and No Line on the Horizon‘s “I’ll Go Crazy If I Don’t Go Crazy Tonight.”

Tracks like “Sunday Bloody Sunday,” “I Still Haven’t Found What I’m Looking For,” “With or Without You,” and “One” will remain in heavy rotation on rock radio until the sun burns out and we also worship Beta Ray Bill. If this is the end, then their legacy is safe. But can you think of a band who really went out on a high note? If you can, remind us in the comments.

Read more at EW.com:
U2 break Rolling Stones’ record for highest-grossing tour of all time
Garbage return with first new recording in six years — a cover of U2′s ‘Who’s Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses’: Hear it here!
U2, Lady Gaga: On the Scene at the Clinton concert

Comments (102 total) Add your comment
Page: 1 2 3 4
  • angeljake

    The Police.

    • Jackie

      Oh, I hope they’re done. U2 is so annoying. Their music is the kind you can tap your foot to or hear on a commercial, but wouldn’t make you feel anything. (For the last 15 years at least.)
      And I for one think it would be absolutely hilarious if their last album was titled “No End On the Horizon”. :)

      • Mindy

        Of course, that isn’t the title of the album.

    • Cate

      The Police, heck yes they went out on a high note.

      • CRobber

        The Police did go out on a high note. At their last performance, they ceremoniously passed their instruments to the young band they saw as their heirs apparent…U2.

      • Dake

        Joshua Tree was great. Discotech, Elevation, Commercialization of U2 have really turned some people off, that perhaps were huge fans back in the 80s. I find it baffling sometimes where I listen to an old old U2 cd, and I ask myself, how can this be the same band that makes music like Vertigo? Uno? Dos? Tres? Que Lastima.

  • Shane

    Easy answer- Oasis. While their last 3 albums certainly can’t top their first 3, Dig Out Your Soul was by far the strongest album of Oasis 2.0. It was so strong it left me wanting more and wishing the Gallaghers would set aside these silly Beady Eye and Birds and just get back together already!

    • Nathan

      They will, I see the big reunion tour happening sometime before 2015 at the very latest.

    • Phil

      Sincerely. As a 33 yr old, they were consistent when I was a young adult, and other than one truly awful concert in Philly on the Festival Pier a few years ago, I’ve prolly seen oasis in concert more than any other artist in my entire life. Haha But as far as a reunion goes…I dunno, the Gallagher brothers will always seem to fight over something as simple as who can breathe more air in at the same time.

    • Rich

      Disagree. Two stone cold classics with the first two albums, then a bunch of wheel-spinning afterwards. If they’d broken up after What’s The Story their legacy would be untouchable.

  • Nathan

    This is one of those bands I just assumed would go on until they die like the Stones and Aerosmith, if this is the end, they’ve certainly had a hell of a run. Somehow I doubt they’re over.

    • filler

      They’re a lot like the Stones in one sense. A ton of mediocroty with the odd gem here and there.

  • John

    Simon and Garfunkel
    The Police
    Nirvana
    Sublime

    • Idviceroy

      Nirvana shouldn’t count since a death, not a break up, caused the end of the band.

      • Rich

        Ditto Sublime.

  • outside agitator

    the three you mentioned are only classics if you’ve never heard rock n roll from 1950-1979. sure, Achtung Baby was a new direction in production was the song have extremely weak melodies and many are over-produced. Next to Are You Experienced of The Doors it doesn’t stand up. U2 could never have written/performed The End or Light My Fire. Joshua Tree is better but in 1969 Trip Through Your Wires would be seen as the lame blues it is. Joshue Tree has some great tunes but Bono’s over singing EVERY friggin’ line and Edge’s simple solos just don’t cut it. many songs on All That You Can’t Leave Behind have no melodies at all. you call Rattle and Hum and Pop bold experiments. if albums filled with laughably bad songs are considered bold experiments, buy a used Cowboy Troy cd for 50 cents. when Bono says “Edge, play the blues…” on Rattle, it’s a crack-up. War is their best album…10 great songs without the over production and where that damn echo unit hasn’t reared its ugly head. U2 and REM would’ve been guppies in the pond next to The Who, Led Zep and The Stones.

    • outside agitator

      damn typos.

      • Huh

        damn nonsense

  • jim

    The Beatles. C’mon. Abbey Road.

    • LOL

      Exactly ^^^^^

    • John

      Only if you count Abbey Road. Let It Be was a letdown

      • outside agitator

        find a boot of the Get Back sessions. there’s some good stuff on there. any band with Let It Be on their final record would be lucky indeed.

      • orville

        Let It Be (while technically recorded before Abbey Road) is a fine album to go out on. You could feel that they were all getting along again, the collaboration was strong, and I love the acoustic feel to many of the songs.

  • B

    The White Stripes. Icky Thump

    • Phil

      Most over rated duo/band of the last 20 years. “Seven Nation Army” was their ONLY redeeming highlight for someone like me.

      • Dave

        @Phil, then you have bad taste….

      • Phil

        In my *humble opinion, the band woulda been more appropriately named The White Trash.

      • Jeremy DC

        Seven Nation Army is the only song of theirs I would ever skip. It’s too boring and monotonous for me. Everything else on Elephant is perfect and De Stijl is my favorite of theirs. Also, they did end on a heck of a high note.

      • Dave

        @Phil – one man’s “Trash” is another man’s treasure……

  • John

    How could I forget The Smiths

  • paqpaqa

    The White Stripes. I wouldn’t put Nirvana or The Beatles here since its a different situation with dead band members.

    • blake

      But the Beatles were all alive when they broke up, so they do count

    • Am I the Crazy One?

      Why are people naming bands? Isn’t the author asking what would be U2′s legacy as in what will they be remembered for?

      • reading works

        Because the author also asked which bands ended on a high note.

  • Jono

    Rattle and Hum is far from a failed experiment. Quite the contrary, it’s terrific. Solid covers of classic rock songs, lasting original works like “Desire,” “Angel of Harlem,” and “All I Want is You,” and the powerhouse duet of Bono and B.B. King in “When Love Comes to Town”…how is that a failure? Most U2 fans I know love the album.

    • B

      Agreed, Rattle & Hum gets the failure tag because of the movie, some great music but as a concert film it’s…lacking something

  • Ed

    Rage Against the Machine.

  • Scusa

    The Pixies’ “worst” album is still about 50x better than most bands’ best. Poor example.

    • Ed

      That was my second choice!

      • Jeremy DC

        I love everything The Pixies ever did.

    • Mother Nature

      @Scusa
      Truer words were never spoken.

    • Toes

      I might be in a minority, but I find Trompe Le Monde infinitely more listenable than Surfer Rosa.

    • yup

      Agreed. Pixies had no weak albums. Brilliant catalogue from start to finish.

  • Chris

    I may dislike U2 personally, but just because there is turmoil in the band does not mean that the records produced will be terrible. Aerosmith was constantly on the verge of breaking up while working on Nine Lives, their last stellar album, and most of the Beatles’ best work (The White Album, Let it Be, Abbey Road) was made when they were barely talking to one another beyond the music. So there is definitely room for one last bang. That being said, I just don’t want to listen to any of it.

  • susie

    U2 is not done yet…give Bona a year or so and he will be back. After the last amazing tour they could go on forever!

    • Will Lickett

      Have to agree. The insuFferable attention whore doesn’t have it in him to lay low. Sadly, U2 will be churning out it’s brand of pretentious pap for many years to come.

  • Z

    Their legacy will be that they are probably one of the most overrated bands of all time.

    • Esox

      Swing and a miss…Captain Wrong

    • Ruby

      I have to agree with Z. I don’t think U2 is a terrible band at all or anything like that. But they are quite overrated. Not as amazing as people make them out to be.

      • Jay

        I’m not a huge U2 fan, but I really hate when people use the “overrated” line…

Page: 1 2 3 4
Add your comment
The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject - or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.

When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP